1993

Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 173.  Tuesday, 16 March 1993.
 
(1)     From:   Steve Urkowitz <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 15 Mar 93 23:00:44 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0171  Juliet's Drowse
 
(2)     From:   Stephen Orgel <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 15 Mar 93 21:18:26 PST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0172  Q: Surnames
 
(3)     From:   William Proctor Williams <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 15 Mar 93 21:20 CST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0132  Assorted Queries
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Steve Urkowitz <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 15 Mar 93 23:00:44 EST
Subject: 4.0171  Juliet's Drowse
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0171  Juliet's Drowse
 
Sure.  Grind up a few pages of OF GRAMMATOLOGY, mix with herbs gathered under
the lecterns at MLA sessions, dilute in the limpid waters of textual
collations, and feed to the victim.  Wake-up time depends on the page numbers,
the numbers attending the MLA session, and the total number of texts being
collated.
 
        Next question, please.
                                Dr. Steven Drowzewitz SURCC@CUNYVM
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Stephen Orgel <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 15 Mar 93 21:18:26 PST
Subject: 4.0172  Q: Surnames
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0172  Q: Surnames
 
Yes: and the Countess of Bedford is always referred to as Lucy Harington,
not Lucy Russell, ie by her father's name not her husband's.
 
Stephen Orgel
 
(3)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           William Proctor Williams <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 15 Mar 93 21:20 CST
Subject: 4.0132  Assorted Queries
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0132  Assorted Queries
 
I've been away for a few days so this is a very late response,
but Roy Flannagan does raise an interesting point:  why is the verse
typically given by Shakespeare to his romantic (good?) characters such
bad stuff?  Is the poetry given to the baddies always good or is it bad
too?  And why is some of the "verse" given to prophetic characters (e.g.,
Fool in +Lear+) frequently incomprehensible?
 
Just asking.
 
William Proctor Williams               TB0WPW1@NIU

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.