Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 180.  Friday, 19 March 1993.
 
(1)     From:   Michael Friedman <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 19 Mar 1993 17:07:45 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0178  Re: Productions of *TGV*
 
(2)     From:   William Proctor Williams <TB0WPW1@NIU.BITNET>
        Date:   Friday, 19 Mar 93 10:49 CST
        Subj:   [Q: London Flat]
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Michael Friedman <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 19 Mar 1993 17:07:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 4.0178  Re: Productions of *TGV*
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0178  Re: Productions of *TGV*
 
In response to Helen Ostovich's assertion that there is no evidence that a real
dog was used on Shakespeare's stage, I wonder if there is any evidence that
something else was used in its place (a human actor, a stuffed animal, an
imaginary dog).  I believe that Launce's lines call for him to play off of
something present on stage, even if it's there only in his mind.
 
                                                        Michael Friedman
                                                        Friedman@Scranton
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           William Proctor Williams <TB0WPW1@NIU.BITNET>
Date:           Friday, 19 Mar 93 10:49 CST
Subject:        [Q: London Flat]
 
A colleague who is not on e-mail is looking for an inexpensive flat-share or
sublet in London from July or September 1993 through June of 1994.  Replies can
come to me and I'll pass them on to him.
 
Thanks,
 
William Proctor Williams            TB0WPW1@NIU
Department of English, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115  USA