Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 1993 :: November ::
Re: Incest
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 737.  Tuesday, 9 November 1993.
 
From:           David Glassco <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 08 Nov 1993 13:26:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject:        Re: Gertrude
 
Re Ann M. Cox and Gertrude's "incest". I speak from a hearty ignorance
about all this, but I have always assumed that matters of "incest" were not
quite so un-ambiguous as Cox suggests. Henry VIII had recently set aside
Katherine of Aragon on the grounds that since she had been previously
"married" (or was it merely "affianced"?) to Arthur, his brother, their
marriage was incestuous. But surely most people would have seen this
manoeuvre for the self-serving bit of persiflage it really was...and would
have realized that had Henry not complained, no one else was likely to.
Don't we suspect that both Hammie and Hammie's dad complain so much
about the "incest" because they are really horrified by all the sexual
implications neither wants to face?
 
David Glassco
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.