1993

Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 4, No. 623.  Sunday, 3 October 1993.
 
(1)     From:   Gabriel Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Saturday, 02 Oct 93 14:39:04 +0100
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0620 Re: Editing *Hamlet*
 
(2)     From:   William Godshalk <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Saturday, 02 Oct 1993 20:05:13 -0400 (EDT)
        Subj:   Re: Jonson Videos; Editing *Ham*; Don Pedro; Scolds
 
(3)     From:   Dennis Kennedy <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
        Date:   Saturday, 2 Oct 1993 10:58 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0618  Re: Shakespeare and Politics Discussion
 
(4)     From:   Nancy W Miller <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Saturday, 2 Oct 93 12:34:37 EDT
        Subj:   Re: SHK 4.0615  Scolds Article
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Gabriel Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Saturday, 02 Oct 93 14:39:04 +0100
Subject: 4.0620 Re: Editing *Hamlet*
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0620 Re: Editing *Hamlet*
 
> I'd suggest that a hypertext HAMLET would be a fascinating project requiring
> highly imaginative stacking.  The connections among the versions bounce in
> strange and often non-linear ways.  The relatively easy Q2-F interactions
> would be simple, but as several modern essays seem to demonstrate, they're not
> nearly as compelling as the juicy extravagancies of q1-q2-F layerings.
 
How about weaving Stoppard's *Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead*
into it? Perhaps as a separate project for teaching, without all
the Q and F layerings.
 
Gabriel Egan
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. *
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           William Godshalk <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Saturday, 02 Oct 1993 20:05:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:        Re: Jonson Videos; Editing *Ham*; Don Pedro; Scolds
 
My apologies to Al Cacicedo. Yes, as far as I know Arragon (or Aragon) is in
Spain. And the script is pretty definite that Don Pedro is the prince thereon.
I guess Terence is right: we farm boys can be pretty ignorant.
 
Yours in SHAME, Bill Godshalk
 
(3)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Dennis Kennedy <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Date:           Saturday, 2 Oct 1993 10:58 EST
Subject: 4.0618  Re: Shakespeare and Politics Discussion
Comment:        Re: SHK 4.0618  Re: Shakespeare and Politics Discussion
 
David Bank has forgot: there were two subjects in this lengthy exchange,
one about the politics of Shakespeare, the other about Wanamaker's CBE and
the Globe project.  The fact that discussion about the first became
conflated with the second seems to prove the point some of us have been
trying to make in print, that ideas about Shakespeare's own ideology or
the ideological status of the plays cannot be extricated from our own
political (or social or cultural) positions in the fin of our siecle.
 
Dennis Kennedy
Univ. of Pittsburgh
 
(4)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
My thanks to all who responded so quickly, and my apologies to Lynda Boose for
forgetting her name.  It is an excellent article.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.