Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 5, No. 0433.  Saturday, 14 May 1994.
 
(1)     From:   Don Foster <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 13 May 1994 14:16:36 -0400 (EDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 5.0430  Q: *Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead*
 
(2)     From:   Gloria Wilson <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 13 May 1994 15:00:40 CST6
        Subj:   Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Don Foster <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 13 May 1994 14:16:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: 5.0430  Q: *Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead*
Comment:        Re: SHK 5.0430  Q: *Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead*
 
To: Gloria Wilson
 
The last time that I checked the MLA On-Line Catalogue, there were a couple
of dozen critical studies that dealt in whole or part with R&G are dead
(but you'll want to look for Stoppard, not Stoddard). By the way, the film
version is a near-perfect disaster.  It's hard to believe that Stoppard had
anything to do with it.  Good luck.  Don Foster
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Gloria Wilson <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 13 May 1994 15:00:40 CST6
Subject:        Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
 
I apologize for reposting, but I mistyped "Stoddard" for "Stoppard" in previous
post.  My question should read:
 
Does anyone use Tom Stoppard's play "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead"
(Excuse the quotations marks; I can't underline) in their curriculum? Do you
know how much critical work has been done on it?