Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 5, No. 1008. Thursday, 15 December 1994.
(1) From: Paul Lord <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 14 Dec 94 11:13:02 EST
Subj: WWW site
(2) From: Phyllis Rackin <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 14 Dec 1994 12:27:16 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 5.1006 Role of Fate in *Rom.*
(3) From: Patricia Palermo <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 14 Dec 1994 12:31:43 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 5.1000 Assorted *Macbeth* Items
(4) From: Milla Riggio <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Dec 1994 02:17:24 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 5.0993
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Paul Lord <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 14 Dec 94 11:13:02 EST
Subject: WWW site
Hardy and SHAKSPER members,
I am in the process of transferring and converting the SHAKSPER list archives
to HTML, for inclusion on an "Elizabethan/Jacobean Drama page" which will run
on sunsite.unc.edu. I'd call it the Shakespeare Page, but there are already
several of those, and I see a need for a page to address other issues and
authors of the period. I hope to have this done on or around Jan. 1, and to
include the ability to perform a full text search on the archives.
Currently, I'm working on the following:
* The SHAKSPER mailing list archives.
* Pointers to online texts and related Web pages.
* A description of all related mailing lists, possibly with hotlinks which
would mail off the appropriate "subscribe" message when selected.
What else would be appropriate? An area for contributed papers? I welcome your
suggestions.
Regards,
Paul
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Phyllis Rackin <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 14 Dec 1994 12:27:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 5.1006 Role of Fate in *Rom.*
Comment: Re: SHK 5.1006 Role of Fate in *Rom.*
> From: Rose McManus <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Last week a lively, and occasionally heated
> exchange focused on the role of fate vs. cultural and historic contexts in
> producing the bittersweet outcome of Romeo & Juliet.
>
> The reading I've done over the years suggests that this may be a tired topic
> for scholars. Still, I'd love to receive thoughtful comments on the matter
> from any interested parties.
Have you seen Dympna Callaghan's chapter, "The Ideology of Romantic love: The
Case of Romeo and Juliet," in *The Weyward sisters: Shakespeare and Feminist
Politics* (Blackwell, 1994)? I think it's the best (most exciting, most
convincing, most illuminating) analysis I've read in many years.
(3)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Patricia Palermo <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Wednesday, 14 Dec 1994 12:31:43 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 5.1000 Assorted *Macbeth* Items
Comment: Re: SHK 5.1000 Assorted *Macbeth* Items
I was interested in Bernice Kliman's post regarding the NYC Macbeth because I
will be going to see it this weekend, and before I go I have a question. A
local paper says that there is much nudity in the production, and that it is a
"most unusual take on an old play." Can Ms. Kliman, or other subscribers in
the know, tell me more?
Thanks,
Patricia Palermo
(4)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Milla Riggio <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Dec 1994 02:17:24 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 5.0993
Comment: Re: SHK 5.0993
Dear Matthew Hennerson:
Indeed in what now seems to have been my infancy (but may have been an early
dotage) I saw the Zefferelli MUCH ADO, I believe, in `65 (senility ?). From
this far away vantage point, I remember Dogberry as very good, not because of
voices and accents but because he was accompanied by a kind of Sicilian street
band of musicians, who I thought were terrific. I also remember statues coming
to life around the corners of fountains, and not much about acting at all. But
I do remember thinking it was quite wonderful.
Did I dream it all?
Best,
Milla Riggio
|
