1994

Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 5, No. 0902.  Tuesday, 8 November 1994.
 
(1)     From:   Victor Gallerano <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 7 Nov 1994 09:07:54 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   Re: authorship
 
(2)     From:   E. L. Epstein <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 07 Nov 1994 09:12:12 EDT
        Subj:   RE: SHK 5.0898  Authorship
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Victor Gallerano <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 7 Nov 1994 09:07:54 -0500 (EST)
Subject:        Re: authorship
 
On the issue of Stratford vs. Oxford I begrudge no one his or her hobby horse:
de gustibus non disputandam est.  But the recent exchange has put me in mind of
a story told of Ezra Pound.  At the age of 84 old Wuz wuz given an apparently
breathless, grad-student version of Millman Parry's oral-formula explanation
for Homer's epics.
 
"Very interesting,"  sez old Wuz, "but it don't tell you why Homer is so much
better than everybody else."  Mutatis mutandis...well, you can figure it out.
To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, "Historicism makes cowards of us all."
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           E. L. Epstein <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 07 Nov 1994 09:12:12 EDT
Subject: 5.0898  Authorship
Comment:        RE: SHK 5.0898  Authorship
 
Thank you David kathman for your courteous reply. And I though I was joking!
Now I do not need to read the Ogburns, or anyone else for that matter. Thank
you again! E.L.Epstein

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.