Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 5, No. 0832. Friday, 21 October 1994.
 
(1)     From:   James Schaeffer <SCHAEFEJ@GUVAX.BITNET>
        Date:   Thursday, 20 Oct 1994 12:49:44 -0400 (EDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 5.0824  Re: Hotspur
 
(2)     From:   Milla Riggio <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 20 Oct 1994 16:18:23 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 5.0824  Re: Hotspur
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           James Schaeffer <SCHAEFEJ@GUVAX.BITNET>
Date:           Thursday, 20 Oct 1994 12:49:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: 5.0824  Re: Hotspur
Comment:        Re: SHK 5.0824  Re: Hotspur
 
To Edward Gero:
 
No apologies needed!  Nice insights!
 
Jim Schaefer

 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Milla Riggio <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 20 Oct 1994 16:18:23 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 5.0824  Re: Hotspur
Comment:        Re: SHK 5.0824  Re: Hotspur
 
To all regarding Edward Gero's letter:
 
I too saw the Henry IV.  It's a glorious production!  I recommend it, and I'm
delighted to have been able to see parts of H IV, Part II for the first time in
my life.  I must say that two intelligent young folk who accompanied me to the
play said they would not have gone to see Part II without Part I, so despite my
own love of this play, there may be a good reason it's never acted alone.  Gero
is particularly good, by the way, along with his aggressive, sexually inclined
wife.  On a minor note, I'm supposing Burbage would NOT have played Falstaff.
Is this right?
 
Best,
Milla Riggio