Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 1995 :: August ::
Re: Puns and New Bibliography
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 6, No. 0647.  Saturday, 26 August 1995.
 
(1)     From:   W. L. Godshalk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 25 Aug 1995 17:21:32 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 6.0640  Re: Puns
 
(2)     From:   Martin Green <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 25 Aug 1995 21:43:14 -0400
        Subj:   Re: "New" New Bibliography.
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           W. L. Godshalk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 25 Aug 1995 17:21:32 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 6.0640  Re: Puns
Comment:        Re: SHK 6.0640  Re: Puns
 
>I think in the light of the "new" New Bibliography we really need to revise
>our notions about puns in Shakespeare, don't we?
>
>John Drakakis
 
O.K., I'll admit it (again); I'm puzzled.  In what ways does Random Clod
(that old punster) demand that we revise our notions of Shakespeare as a
punster?  Do you mean that "Falstaff" is not a pun on "Shake-speare"?
 
Yours, God's Hawk
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Martin Green <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 25 Aug 1995 21:43:14 -0400
Subject:        Re: "New" New Bibliography.
 
What is the "new" New Bibliography, and what bearing does it have on puns?
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.