1996

Shakespeare Electronic Conference, SHK 7.0877.  Monday, 25, November 1996.

(1)     From:   Gabriel Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 22 Nov 1996 20:51:24 -0800
        Subj:   Re: SHK 7.0846  Re: Politics and Interpretation

(2)     From:   W. L. Godshalk <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 22 Nov 1996 22:56:50 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 7.0871  Re: Politics


(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Gabriel Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 22 Nov 1996 20:51:24 -0800
Subject: 7.0846  Re: Politics and Interpretation
Comment:        Re: SHK 7.0846  Re: Politics and Interpretation

Andy White wrote

>There seem to be people on this list who insist on political interpretations of
>a decidedly leftist stripe; would it be irrelevant to point out that in
>England, as well as in the Communist world (China comes to mind in particular),
>popular forms of entertainment are rejected out of hand, branded "elitist" and
>persecuted despite the facts?

However popular drama used to be, it can hardly be said to be popular now. Just
on numbers and the self-identification of class by theatre-goers
(predominantly, they say they are 'middle') it must be called an elitist
entertainment whether or not you approve of it being so. I recall Terry Hawkes
writing in the 1960s or 70s on exit polls at theatres in Stratford on Avon.

I shan't comment on White's story about the Globe funding other than to say it
seems to imply that a punitive fine was imposed on Southwark council (else how
did the project gain capital by it?) which, I thought, was something the
British judicial system does not allow. I'd be interested in informed responses
on this. I'll go and look for the story in Barry Day's book _This wooden 'O':
Shakespeare's Globe reborn_ which purports to be a history of the project.

Gabriel Egan

(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           W. L. Godshalk <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 22 Nov 1996 22:56:50 -0500
Subject: 7.0871  Re: Politics
Comment:        Re: SHK 7.0871  Re: Politics

John Drakakis writes:

>Althusser DOES give an account of change: when the forces of production are out
>of synchronization with the relations of production.  All very simple really.

Unfortunately, I don't understand how this imbalance leads to ideological
change. Perhaps a less abstract and more specific, concrete answer would lead
me to an understanding of how Althusser accounts for ideological change in his
chapter on ideology and ISAs.

Yours, Bill Godshalk

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.