|
Re: Applause Facsimile *All's Well* Production |
Shakespeare Electronic Conference, SHK 7.0696. Wednesday, 25 September 1996.
(1) From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 24 Sep 1996 11:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 7.0688 Q: Applause Facsimile
(2) From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 24 Sep 1996 11:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 7.0689 Productions: *All's Well*
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 24 Sep 1996 11:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 7.0688 Q: Applause Facsimile
Comment: Re: SHK 7.0688 Q: Applause Facsimile
Apparently, it was in violation because it used Hinman's line numbering system.
It seems like a stretch to me, but Norton could afford a bigger legal battle
than Applause, so it hardly matters.
Cheers,
Sean.
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Tuesday, 24 Sep 1996 11:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 7.0689 Productions: *All's Well*
Comment: Re: SHK 7.0689 Productions: *All's Well*
Hi.
I found David's description of *All's Well* really interesting, as his posts
tend to be. There is, however, a different reading available, in which Bertram
is rebelling against getting virtually raped by someone who's able to demand
his hand without anything like his permission. Rejecting the countess, a
co-conspirator in this assault, as well as the whole of "female" civility for a
strictly male world is only a logical response.
Of course, what happens to Bertram is only a gender-reversal of what happens to
any number of female characters. Kate in *Taming* comes to mind. This can
allow us to sympathy with him, a victim like those we tend to lionize.
Cheers,
Sean.
|