The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 8.0276. Wednesday, 26 February 1997.
From: Leonard Wasserman <
Date: Tuesday, 25 Feb 1997 15:14:31 -0500
Subject: Q: *Cardenio*
Is *Cardenio* *The Second Mayden's Tragedy*, as Charles Hamilton said?
Does E. Sams agree with Hamilton on this point?
Any comments about Cardenio? I know everybody BOOs at Hamilton's guess
about the Second Mayden's Tragedy (hereafter SMT), but, you never
Has anyone suggested anything besides SMT (Don't tell me about
<italic>Double Falsehood<italic>)? If not, we'll have to stick with
Hamilton's theory, crazy as it may sound.
Your honour's all in duty,
Gabriel Z. Wasserman