1997

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 8.0519.  Friday, 2 May 1997.

[1]     From:   Steve Urkowitz <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Thursday, 01 May 97 18:56:14 EDT
        Subj:   Re: The Subject and the Construction of the Soliloquy

[2]     From:   Terence Hawkes <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 2 May 1997 04:25:43 -0400
        Subj:   SHK 8.0516  Re: Subtext

[3]     From:   Daniel Vitkus <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Thursday, 1 May 1997 19:38:52 GMT
        Subj:   RE: SHK 8.0514  Re: OED and CD-ROM Pricing


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Steve Urkowitz <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 01 May 97 18:56:14 EDT
Subject:        Re: The Subject and the Construction of the Soliloquy

You might want to look at the 1595 and 1623 versions of 3 Henry VI,
3.2.  Richa rd has a long soliloquy.  The earlier-printed text is
strictly logical, a text-book syllogism.  The later version roils with
"subjectivity" and self awareness and self-delusion.  Neat.

        Good luck.
        Steve Urquartowitz

[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Terence Hawkes <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 2 May 1997 04:25:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Subtext
Comment:        SHK 8.0516  Re: Subtext

David Jackson observes that a lot of 'issues' are always churning around
in the 'minds' of Shakespeare's characters. Yes, I thought I caught a
slight smirk on the face of that Hamlet only the other day. I blame his
mother myself. Do they ever think about us?

T. Hawkes

[3]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Daniel Vitkus <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 1 May 1997 19:38:52 GMT
Subject: 8.0514  Re: OED and CD-ROM Pricing
Comment:        RE: SHK 8.0514  Re: OED and CD-ROM Pricing

It's either greed or incompetence that keeps these CD-ROMs so
pricey-perhaps an unfortunate combination of "marketing" misapprehension
and lust for profit.  It's global pillage in the global village, as they
say.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.