The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 8.0750.  Friday, 11 July 1997.

From:           Ron Ward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 11 Jul 1997 15:21:22 +1200 (NZST)
Subject: 8.0746  Various Re: Hamlet
Comment:        Re: SHK 8.0746  Various Re: Hamlet

In the various discussions on Hamlet's feigned or real madness no one
has attempted to classify it as legal or clinical madness. Not terribly
relevant to S, to whom such a distinction would probably be meaningless;
the McNaughton rules being some centuries away. However, Macbeth defined
it in a way that one eminent psychologist (Eysenik I think) thought was
helpful. Perhaps some one could quote the exact reference but it went
something like "Madness! why tis nothing but to be mad"

Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.