Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 1998 :: February ::
Re: MM
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.0160  Monday, 23 February 1998.

[1]     From:   Jean R. Brink <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 19 Feb 1998 10:04:53 -0700 (MST)
        Subj:   Re: Religious Imagery in Measure for Measure

[2]     From:   Karen E. Bruhn <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Friday, 20 Feb 1998 11:58:36 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   MfM--not religious


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Jean R. Brink <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 19 Feb 1998 10:04:53 -0700 (MST)
Subject: 9.0151  Q: Religious Imagery in Measure for Measure
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.0151  Q: Religious Imagery in Measure for Measure

I would also check the Shakespeare Bibliography.  It is supposed to be
on-line, and we have been ordering some years but not others.  The
English reference librarian will know.  You should also check recent
issues of Shakespeare Quarterly, Shakespeare Studies, and Shakespeare
Survey because they will be in current periodicals but not yet picked up
by bibliographies.

Jean R. Brink
English Department
Arizona State University

[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Karen E. Bruhn <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 20 Feb 1998 11:58:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject:        MfM--not religious

I guess I didn't make myself clear on my original request...I don't need
"MfM and religion" type citations; I need to make sure that I am not
neglecting important work on the play-no matter the topic-so that I can
place my own reading of the play in some kind of historiographical
context.  The Lawrence Ross work looks good-thank you Stephen Cohen-and
I've come up w/ Marc Shell's book, and several articles that deal w/
gender, political philosophy, constructions of law, etc.  Because this
is a peripheral field for me, I don't have a good sense of what is fluff
what is not.  So anyone w/ strong opinions on what constitutes seminal
work on MfM, please let know...

Thanks again
Karen Bruhn
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.