Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 1998 :: March ::
Q: King John
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.0276  Saturday, 28 March 1998.

From:           Michael Ullyot <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 27 Mar 1998 13:30:12 -0500
Subject: 9.0262  Q: As You Like It
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.0262  Q: As You Like It

Scott Crozier's question about Robin Hood dramatisations has led me to
another question: as a reader of _King John_ (which I have yet to see in
production, not surprisingly, since it is so rarely done) I note some
significant absences in the play-and while it is (no doubt) wrong to
call a play to task for absent material, I do wonder this: why is there
no mention in the play of the two best-known elements of John's reign?
Namely, the Robin Hood connection and (of course) the Magna Carta? I
wonder what theories are swirling about to explain Shakespeare's failure
to mention these elements of the monarch's historical background.
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.