The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.0368  Monday, 20 April 1998.

[1]     From:   Michael Ullyot <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Sunday, 19 Apr 1998 01:08:13 -0400
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.0364  Shakespeare as Character

[2]     From:   Simon Malloch <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Sunday, 19 Apr 1998 21:09:00 +0800
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.0364  Shakespeare as Character/"These Our Revels"


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Michael Ullyot <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Sunday, 19 Apr 1998 01:08:13 -0400
Subject: 9.0364  Shakespeare as Character
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.0364  Shakespeare as Character

Laura Fargas writes:

| There is a late story by Borges called "Shakespeare's Memory" in this
| week's issue of the New Yorker.

I wonder if there is an electronic version (do they have an online
version?  somehow I doubt it) of this article and if so, if someone
could either direct SHAKSPERians to it or post it to the list.

Michael Ullyot

[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Simon Malloch <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Sunday, 19 Apr 1998 21:09:00 +0800
Subject: 9.0364  Shakespeare as Character/"These Our Revels"
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.0364  Shakespeare as Character/"These Our Revels"

Laura Fargas <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 > wrote:

> ...my co-author, is a novelist who trained as a post-modernist...

Well, that is interesting. I have never heard of such a thing as being
"trained" as a post-modernist.  Trained in what?  Can you imagine it:
"What do you do for a living?" "I'm a post-modernist. And rich, too."

No offence, of course, to your co-author; I just thought that your
phrasing was humorous.

Simon Malloch