1998

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.1144  Monday, 16 November 1998.

[1]     From:   Sara Vandenberg <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 13 Nov 1998 09:32:36 -0800 (PST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.1134  Re: King James Bible

[2]     From:   Richard J Kennedy <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 13 Nov 1998 11:09:35 -0800 (PST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.1134  Re: Isabella


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Sara Vandenberg <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 13 Nov 1998 09:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Subject: 9.1134  Re: King James Bible
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.1134  Re: King James Bible

To supplement David Kathman's posting, people might consult _Translating
for King James; being a true copy of the only noted made by a translator
[John Bois] of King James's Bible, the Authorized Version, as the Final
Committee of Review revised the translation of Romans through
Revelations at Stationers Hall in London in 11810-1611_, ed. Ward Allen
(Vanderbilt University Press, 1969).

Sara van den Berg
University of Washington

[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Richard J Kennedy <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 13 Nov 1998 11:09:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: 9.1134  Re: Isabella
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.1134  Re: Isabella

David Kathman is wrong in supposing that the trick with Psalm 46 is
repeated in an earlier or later translation of the Bible.  Possibly he
gets his information from Friedman, and Friedman was wrong about this.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.