The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.0956  Wednesday, 7 October 1998.

[1]     From:   Frances K. Barasch <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Tuesday, 6 Oct 1998 11:42:17 EDT
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.0946  Re: "Bad" Shakespeare

[2]     From:   David Schalkwyk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Wednesday, 7 Oct 1998 11:59:01 SAST-2
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.0946  Re: "Bad" Shakespeare


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Frances K. Barasch <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Tuesday, 6 Oct 1998 11:42:17 EDT
Subject: 9.0946  Re: "Bad" Shakespeare
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.0946  Re: "Bad" Shakespeare

To Krystyna et al.:  about Charney.  Yes, there is a book edited by
Maurice Charney, called 'BAD' SHAKESPEARE, REVALUATIONS OF THE
SHAKESPEARE CANON. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Pr. , 1988.
frances k. barasch

[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           David Schalkwyk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 7 Oct 1998 11:59:01 SAST-2
Subject: 9.0946  Re: "Bad" Shakespeare
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.0946  Re: "Bad" Shakespeare

Steiner's lectures on "bad Shakespeare" are based on Wittgenstein's
musings on his own inability to recognise Shakespeare's supposed
greatness. To Wittgenstein *all* Shakespeare is bad.  His notes (not
meant for publication) are in the collection _Culture and Value_
(Oxford: Blackwell).

David Schalkwyk