|
Re: New Shakespeare Films by Branagh |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.0976 Friday, 9 October 1998.
[1] From: Jad Duwaik <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 08 Oct 1998 13:37:25 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 9.0968 New Shakespeare Films by Branagh
[2] From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 08 Oct 1998 22:43:04 -0700
Subj: Re: SHK 9.0968 Re: New Shakespeare Films by Branagh
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jad Duwaik <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 08 Oct 1998 13:37:25 -0400
Subject: 9.0968 New Shakespeare Films by Branagh
Comment: Re: SHK 9.0968 New Shakespeare Films by Branagh
A friend made a comment that the reason Branagh stars in all his films
may be related to pressure from the producers. I think he's correct.
Branagh as a director will not attract the money necessary to fund a
movie, however, Branagh as the star certainly doesn't hurt..
Jad
[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 08 Oct 1998 22:43:04 -0700
Subject: 9.0968 Re: New Shakespeare Films by Branagh
Comment: Re: SHK 9.0968 Re: New Shakespeare Films by Branagh
> So, I take it you consider Robert DeNiro, Helena Bonham Carter and Tom
> Hulce neophyte actors? Not Shakespeareans, but surely not neophytes.
My apologies, to you, Messrs. Holm, deNiro and all the others.
*Frankenstein* was a bad example of using neophyte actors, but it's
certainly a good example of self-indulgence.
And no big deal, Linda, no offence taken. But I do actually think
there's rather a difference between a director making someone else look
good, and casting himself then making himself look good.
Cheers,
Sean.
|