|
Re: Camels; Papp Lr; Bona; Bloom; Props |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0222 Tuesday, 9 February 1999.
[1] From: Tom Reedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 08 Feb 1999 08:39:53 -0600
Subj: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - 5 Feb 1999 to 7 Feb 1999
[2] From: Ed Pixley <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 08 Feb 1999 12:51:15 -0400 (EDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0213 Papp Lear
[3] From: Terence Hawkes <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 8 Feb 1999 12:55:34 -0500
Subj: SHK 10.0210 Re: Bona Bard
[4] From: Larry Schwartz <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 08 Feb 1999 15:17:28 -0600
Subj: Re: Bloom
[5] From: Frank Whigham <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 08 Feb 1999 22:19:16 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0151 Props Question
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tom Reedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Monday, 08 Feb 1999 08:39:53 -0600
Subject: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - 5 Feb 1999 to 7 Feb 1999
<snip>
>Or that both draw on what may have been a familiar saying. I seem to
>remember reading somewhere that in Jerusalem, there was a gate called
>The Needle which was so narrow that a camel couldn't pass, and that this
>became a common image of difficulty or impossibility.
>
>Robin Hamilton
<snip>
>By the way, as I understand it, there's an additional rub. "The eye of
>the needle" was a gate in Jerusalem just large enough for pedestrians.
>Apparently, it was possible to get a camel through on its knees, but
>with enormous difficulty.
>
>Cheers,
>Se
|