The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0236  Thursday, 11 February 1999.

[1]     From:   Steve Urkowitz <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Wednesday, 10 Feb 1999 11:51:23 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 10.0213 Papp Lear

[2]     From:   David Knauer <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Wednesday, 10 Feb 1999 12:59:20 -0600
        Subj:   RE: SHK 10.0230 Re: Bloom


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Steve Urkowitz <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 10 Feb 1999 11:51:23 EST
Subject: 10.0213 Papp Lear
Comment:        Re: SHK 10.0213 Papp Lear

I saw that production of Lear.  Tracing back in memory, James Earl Jones
was okay, but there was little energy between him and his daughters;
they weren't much other than shrill.  But it's a long way back, and I
mostly remember a version in Central Park (maybe in 1961) that convinced
me an an undergraduate to stop studying Physics and go read Shakespeare
instead.

Steve Urquarkowitz

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           David Knauer <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 10 Feb 1999 12:59:20 -0600
Subject: 10.0230 Re: Bloom
Comment:        RE: SHK 10.0230 Re: Bloom

>>Speech
>>will always escape the nets of writing and reading. Poor Bloom.
>
>>T. Hawkes

>>Tell that to Socrates ...
>>Robin Hamilton

Better yet, tell it to Derrida.  Arche-writing, anyone?

David Knauer