Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 1999 :: February ::
MM and the Law
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0253  Saturday, 13 February 1999.

From:           James J. Lombardi <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 12 Feb 99 15:17:00 PST
Subject:        Measure for Measure

Our Inn of Court is planning to present at our monthly dinner meetings a
series of Law & Literature  programs.  Patterned after the English Inns
of Court, which existed in Shakespeare's time, membership includes young
lawyers (pupils), experienced lawyers (barristers) and judges and
leaders of the bar (masters).  The idea is to get lawyers reading and
thinking more about literature, Shakespeare in particular, and its
relationship to their profession. We are starting with Measure for
Measure which seems ideally suited for discussion of a number of current
legal issues; namely, law and morality, the State's reluctance to
enforce or repeal certain laws, sexual harassment, judicial power,
punishment as deterrence and the role of clemency.  We plan to perform
one or two scenes (2.2 & 2.4) and then discuss some of the legal issues
raised in the play.  We'd be grateful for some help in determining the
meaning of the following lines and perhaps elicit some acting techniques
in memorizing and delivering Shakespeare's often difficult poetry.

In 2.2.93-99  Angelo opines that aggressive law enforcement will deter
prospective crimes.  The lines "Either new, or by remissness
new-conceived, And so in progress to be hatched and born" appear to be
referring to some embryonic stage of criminal intent but  the
distinction between "new" evils and "new-conceived" evils seems
tautological:

     [The law] now, 't is awake,
     Takes note of what is done, and, like a prophet
     Looks in a glass, that shows what future evils,
     Either new, or by remissness new-conceived,
     And so in progress to be hatched and born,
     Are now to have no successive degrees,
     But, ere they live, to end.

In 2.4.57-58  as Angelo tries to seduce Isabel who says she would rather
suffer the death of her body than her soul  Angelo's response is
incomprehensible to us:

     I talk not of your soul.  Our compelled sins
     Stand more for number than for accompt.

In 2.2.23-24 there is an equally arcane line  by Isabel who replies to
Angelo's admission of frailty:

     Else let my brother die
     If not a feodary, but only he
     Owe and succeed thy weakness.

We have not been helped by Rowse's Annotated Shakespeare or Asimov's
Guide to Shakespeare and would appreciate any other  suggestions.

Finally, we novice actors would be immensely grateful for any special
memory or delivery  techniques.

Feel free, if you like, to contact me off-list.  Thank you.

Jim Lombardi
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.