The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0085 Sunday, 17 January 1999.
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 15:06:02 -0500
Subject: Q: Mote and Moth
Comment: SHK 10.0068 Q: Mote and Moth
>recent editions of Midsummer Night's Dream
>differ in representing the name of one of Bottom's attendants. Should
>it be Mote or Moth, and what is the textual evidence that has caused the
Charles Boyce, writing of the "Moth" in A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM: "His
name means-and in Elizabethan English was pronounced-'mote' and suggests
the tiny size of a speck of dust."
As you probably know, a "Moth" is featured in LOVE'S LABOUR'S LOST, too.
Again, his name would have been pronounced "Mote" by Elizabethans.