Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 1999 :: January ::
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0113  Thursday, 21 January 1999.

From:           Marion K Morford <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Date:           Wednesday, 20 Jan 1999 15:21:34 +0000
Subject:        Spear-shaking

With all of the research regarding WS and KJV (and the 46 conundrum)
which has been a semi-raging topic recently here on SHAKSPER, perhaps
it's safe (relatively) for me to raise a question. Several years ago I
read some books, some with near convincing paintings of WS, which  took
the position that, in fact, Shakespeare was of African descent (meaning
Black) hence the relatively unusual name "Shakes-speare." Is this
reasonable? Does the Shakespeare name (obviously with alternate
spellings) exist prior to William? Given the British tradition of last
names being based on vocation or location (Miller, Ford, Baker, etc) at
this part of the premise strikes me as plausible.

On the other hand, given the recent 46 discussion, pure plausibility is
not entirely convincing either.

Any thoughts from our armchair, er...keyboard scholars?


Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.