The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0395 Monday, 8 March 1999.
[1] From: Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 05 Mar 1999 16:04:09 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
[2] From: Roger Gross <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Saturday, 6 Mar 1999 00:18:24 -0600 (CST)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
[3] From: Helen Ostovich <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Saturday, 6 Mar 1999 13:32:39 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
[4] From: Richard Dutton <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Saturday, 6 Mar 1999 11:47:05 -0000
Subj: RE: SHK 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
[5] From: Peter Groves <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 08 Mar 1999 08:50:57 +1100
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 05 Mar 1999 16:04:09 -0800
Subject: 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
Comment: Re: SHK 10.0390 Latin-English Grammar Folio
>I believe English grammar "rules" came along later on,
>following the Latin. but if Shakespeare knew "less Latin...," he could
>miss a beat, and those unlearned in Latin would not care.
Somewhere else to look for Shakespeare's grasp of Latin grammar would be
the strange scene 4.1 in Merry Wives of Windsor. I seem to recall
reading somewhere that it's based on Livy, though I could be wrong.
Cheers,
Se