The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0803 Monday, 3 May 1999.
[1] From: Ben Schneider <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 30 Apr 1999 15:40:07 -0500 (CDT)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0790 Re: Chooseth
[2] From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:02:20 -0400
Subj: Parsley Stuffing
[3] From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:05:35 -0400
Subj: Stage Blood
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ben Schneider <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 30 Apr 1999 15:40:07 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: 10.0790 Re: Chooseth
Comment: Re: SHK 10.0790 Re: Chooseth
Check out the real source of gift-giving in Shakespeare, translated in
1578, Senecas De Beneficiis, now available at www.stoics.com, my web
site. A real gift has no strings.
Yours ever
BEN SCHNEIDER
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:02:20 -0400
Subject: Parsley Stuffing
I think the alleged funny part in the TS joke about a wench getting
married on the way to get parsley to stuff a rabbit was the parsley, not
the stuffing. Parsley was reputed to be a dynamic aphrodisiac. The
modern equivalent, told by Beavis & Butthead, would be something like,
"This girl "got married" (heh, heh) on the way to a party when she took
some Ecstasy."
Alan Bray, in "Homosexuality in Renaissance England," refers to "getting
married" as a term used for making love in "molly houses" (more or less
what we would call "gay bars," given the impossibility of finding
parallels in utterly different societies).
Parsley definitely is a diuretic, so the ever-reliable body-functions
humor comes in here too. Don't forget that women wore shifts but not
underpants, so the association of ideas would have been something like
eating parsley-having to urinate-squatting in the field-one thing leads
to another.
By the way, "get stuffed" in the modern context is used to/about men,
based on the supposedly shocking idea that the recipient is liable to be
penetrated by another man. The imputation is much less insulting when
used of a man.
Dana Shilling
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:05:35 -0400
Subject: Stage Blood
I suspect that Shakespeare and his contemporary theaters used the same
thing for stage blood as they used for Cleopatra's barge, the morn in
russet mantle clad, temple-haunting martlets-i.e., they described
something that they didn't have in material form. Considering that
elaborate costumes were a (if not THE) major capital expenditure for a
theater company, they couldn't risk getting gooey red substances all
over them-particularly in light of the primitive laundry practices
discussed in another thread.
Dana Shilling
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
|