The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.0834 Monday, 10 May 1999.
[1] From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 07 May 1999 08:38:22 +0000
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0829 Re: The Tempest
[2] From: Kate Brookfield <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 7 May 1999 02:21:14 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0825 Assorted Responses
[3] From: Charlie Mitchell <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 07 May 1999 17:15:05 -0600
Subj: Colonialist Tempest
[4] From: Moira Russell <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 08 May 1999 17:32:17 -0700
Subj: Re: SHK 10.0829 Re: The Tempest
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 07 May 1999 08:38:22 +0000
Subject: 10.0829 Re: The Tempest
Comment: Re: SHK 10.0829 Re: The Tempest
Karen Peterson-Kranz writes:
>I would suggest to Mr. Mitchell,
>however, that creating an imagined, "uninhabited," magical space in
>which European desires could play on a supposedly empty stage-what
>Shakespeare did in Tempest -- was also exactly what Europe, and
>especially England, did in creating its colonial empire.
This may be so, but I would draw attention to the fact that Bermuda,
often assumed to be the model for the island in The Tempest, actually
was uninhabited apart from people accidentally shipwrecked there.
Surely there's an enormous ethical difference between declaring real
inhabitants of real places to be non-persons, and finding places that
are really uninhabited, or imagining uninhabited places. There's a
difference between watching Gilligan's Island and committing genocide.
Cheers,
Se
|