The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2137 Monday, 6 December 1999.
[1] From: Jill Baumgaertner <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 13:22:47 -0600 (CST)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[2] From: Tom Reedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 13:24:50 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[3] From: Ronald Macdonald <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 14:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[4] From: Roger Gross <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 13:40:38 -0600 (CST)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[5] From: James P. Lusardi <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 15:06:33 -0500 (CDT)
Subj: RE: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[6] From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 15:04:55 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[7] From: Peter Hyland <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 15:07:38 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[8] From: Rick Jones <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 14:14:02 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[9] From: Bradley Ryner <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 14:54:45 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jill Baumgaertner <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 13:22:47 -0600 (CST)
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Stychomathia is the term for the arrangement of dialogue which
alternates speakers, line by line.
Jill Pelaez Baumgaertner
Department of English
Wheaton College
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tom Reedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 13:24:50 -0600
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
I've heard it referred to as a "duologue," and one of my Shakespeare
professors (Wally Bost) coined the term "duelogue."
Tom Reedy
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ronald Macdonald <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 14:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
The term Joanne Walen is looking for is "stichomythia."
--Ron Macdonald
[4]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Roger Gross <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 13:40:38 -0600 (CST)
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
The dialogue style you are talking about is called 'stichomythia'.
Roger Gross
Univ. of Arkansas
[5]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: James P. Lusardi <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 15:06:33 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: RE: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Dear Joanne W.:
Stichomythia.
Jim Lusardi
[6]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 15:04:55 -0500
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Stichomythia.
Yes, that's my final answer,
Dana (Shilling)
[7]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Hyland <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 3 Dec 1999 15:07:38 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
What Joanne Walen is describing is stichomythia. There's a lot of it in
the comedies, particularly in scenes between warring lovers.
Peter Hyland
[8]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rick Jones <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 14:14:02 -0600
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Stichomythia.
Rick
[9]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bradley Ryner <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 03 Dec 1999 14:54:45 -0600
Subject: 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2136 Rhetoric: A Question
The term is "stichomythia." The following definition is from Babette
Deutsch, Poetry Handbook: A Dictionary of Terms. 4th Ed. (Harper
Perennial, 1974):
stichomythia Dialogue, in alternating lines, marked by antithesis and
rhetorical repetition; it is used, as in classical Greek drama, in sharp
altercation. This example is from Hamlet:
Queen: Hamlet, thou has thy father much offended.
Hamlet: Mother, you have my father much offended.
Queen: Come, come, you answer with an idle tongue.
Hamlet: Go, go, you question with a wicked tongue.
Rhetorically,
Brad Ryner
|
