The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2298 Wednesday, 29 December 1999.
[1] From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 23 Dec 1999 10:13:25 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
[2] From: L. Swilley <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 23 Dec 1999 13:26:17 -0600
Subj: A Different Shylock
[3] From: Robert Peters <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 23 Dec 1999 21:13:47 +0100
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
[4] From: Dana Shilling <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 24 Dec 1999 10:22:12 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
[5] From: Tim Richards <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 25 Dec 1999 22:37:44 +1100
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
[6] From: Carol Barton <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 26 Dec 1999 12:06:55 EST
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
[7] From: Joanna Hindle <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 26 Dec 1999 16:17:57 -1000
Subj: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 23 Dec 1999 10:13:25 -0800
Subject: 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
Comment: Re: SHK 10.2292 The Merchant of Venice
Allan Blackman observes:
>The _The Merchant of Venice_ gets little attention in this group. Is it
>because, in this age of political correctness, the play makes some
>uncomfortable? Is it true, as Bloom contends, that "the Holocaust made
>and makes MV unplayable, at least in what appears to be its own terms"?
>
>Can one teach or direct MV today & be faithful to "its own terms"?
I suppose that that depends what one means by "its own terms". Almost
all the discussion of MV seems to do with anti-semitism, which I suppose
is to say that it's discussed in terms forced upon us by the meeting of
the play text with twentieth-century history.
I actually feel that we discuss MV quite a bit in this group-certainly
more than, say, Henry VI, Part 1 or Two Noble Kinsmen-but almost all of
the discussion centers around its anti-Semitism. The real question
isn't whether we can discuss MV, but whether we can talk about anything
other than its politics.
Cheers,
Se
|