1999

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.2099  Tuesday, 30 November 1999.

[1]     From:   Billy Houck <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 29 Nov 1999 16:04:48 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 10.2082 Re: Luhrmann's R+J

[2]     From:   Arthur Lindley <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Tuesday, 30 Nov 1999 09:47:50 +0800
        Subj:   Re: SHK 10.2082 Re: Luhrmann's R+J


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Billy Houck <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 29 Nov 1999 16:04:48 EST
Subject: 10.2082 Re: Luhrmann's R+J
Comment:        Re: SHK 10.2082 Re: Luhrmann's R+J

The only problem I have with this movie is the title. It would have been
more accurately titled "Baz Luhrman's Romeo + Juliet," not "William
Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet."

I find all this wailing and handwringing over Luhrman's interpretive
choices rather tedious and self-indulgent. The movie has been made.
Millions of people, many of them quite young, have seen this movie. It
is available in video stores everywhere. It has earned its creators a
carload of money and fame. It has become a piece of popular culture. It
does not rely upon our approval to exist.

Am I the only one on this list old enough to remember that the Zeferelli
film was once considered "controversial?" (read: "new")

Many teenagers have told me they understood Shakespeare's play better
when they have read it because they have seen the Luhrman film. This is
a good thing.

I do not doubt that in 10-20 years these same teenagers will be very
upset at the liberties taken in the next generation's R+J.

Billy Houck
Arroyo Grande Eagle Theatre

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Arthur Lindley  <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Tuesday, 30 Nov 1999 09:47:50 +0800
Subject: 10.2082 Re: Luhrmann's R+J
Comment:        Re: SHK 10.2082 Re: Luhrmann's R+J

Just for the record, it's Luhrmann with two n's.  The Australian film
industry has enough problems without our mixing up the names.

Regards,
Arthur Lindley

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.