The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.1345  Friday, 30 July 1999.

[1]     From:   Dale Lyles <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 29 Jul 1999 09:10:25 EDT
        Subj:   Re: SHK 10.1339 Re: Elizabeth I

[2]     From:   Judith Craig <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 29 Jul 1999 11:21:29 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 10.1339 Re: Elizabeth I


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Dale Lyles <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 29 Jul 1999 09:10:25 EDT
Subject: 10.1339 Re: Elizabeth I
Comment:        Re: SHK 10.1339 Re: Elizabeth I

At least some people seem think that Elizabeth was not only not a
virgin, but gave birth...  At http://www.sirbacon.org/toc.html, they
even have pictures.  Just like the Weekly World News.  It truly leaves
the head spinning.

Dale Lyles
Newnan Community Theatre Company

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Judith Craig <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 29 Jul 1999 11:21:29 -0500
Subject: 10.1339 Re: Elizabeth I
Comment:        Re: SHK 10.1339 Re: Elizabeth I

I agree with Dana Shilling on Elizabeth's virginity.  She was too smart
to be successfully seduced-especially in an age when the penalty was
often death-and not the favorite Elizabethan metaphor for copulation.

Judy Craig