The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.1086  Tuesday, 29 June 1999.

[1]     From:   Harry Hill <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 28 Jun 1999 14:11:19 -0400 (EDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 10.1081 Re: Buggering and Biggering

[2]     From:   Wes Folkerth <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 28 Jun 1999 21:18:19 -0400
        Subj:   buggering and biggering


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Harry Hill <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 28 Jun 1999 14:11:19 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: 10.1081 Re: Buggering and Biggering
Comment:        Re: SHK 10.1081 Re: Buggering and Biggering

Well, I'll be buggered! I was expecting an exciting and silly ride from
Gabrlel Egan but only got a trot in blinders.

        Harry Hill

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Wes Folkerth <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 28 Jun 1999 21:18:19 -0400
Subject:        buggering and biggering

All this talk reminded me of Scott Wilson's recent book on cultural
materialism, where he compares Shakespeare to a giant, beckoning anus
being "covered" by generations of textual editors.

I'm not so sure whether fidelity to ideas over words is necessarily a
Shakespearean principle.  Do you mean a principle held by Shakespeare,
or a principle held by Shakespeareans?

Wes Folkerth

 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it