2000

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0251  Monday, 7 February 2000.

[1]     From:   W. L. Godshalk <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 04 Feb 2000 11:51:28 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 11.0246 Ur-Hamlet

[2]     From:   H. R. Greenberg <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 4 Feb 2000 17:52:47 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 11.0246 Ur-Hamlet


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           W. L. Godshalk <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 04 Feb 2000 11:51:28 -0500
Subject: 11.0246 Ur-Hamlet
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.0246 Ur-Hamlet

>Could anybody point me toward recent work on the mid-1590s Ur-Hamlet? I
>think I've found an oblique allusion to it, but have no idea whether
>anyone else has turned it up already.

It's hard to do work on a nonexistent and possibly fabulous text,
unless, of course, one identifies Q1 as the UrHamlet. As for the
allusion, why not announce it on this list?  That way we can tell you if
it has or hasn't been noted before.

Yours, Bill Godshalk

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           H. R. Greenberg <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 4 Feb 2000 17:52:47 EST
Subject: 11.0246 Ur-Hamlet
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.0246 Ur-Hamlet

Professor Harold Bloom mentions the Ur-Hamlet in his theorization of the
complete studies of the problem. Best. HR Greenberg MD ENDIT

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.