The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0287 Thursday, 10 February 2000.
[1] From: Alexander Houck <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Wednesday, 09 Feb 2000 13:50:53 -0800
Subj: SHK 11.0276 Re: Money and Prostitution
[2] From: Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Wednesday, 09 Feb 2000 19:08:09 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 11.0276 Re: Money and Prostitution
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alexander Houck <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Wednesday, 09 Feb 2000 13:50:53 -0800
Subject: Re: Money and Prostitution
Comment: SHK 11.0276 Re: Money and Prostitution
This talk of money in Shakespeare and how it translates to modern times
has reminded me of a scene in The Winter's Tale. We're still in the
rehearsal process, so inquiries are still being made to the meaning of
certain phrases. Act 4 Sc. 3 has caught my eye in this vein of money
not only because Autolicus steals the Clowne's money, but because of a
certain phrase in the Clowne's grocery list speech. According to Neil
Freeman's First Folio version, the section in question is as follows:
I cannot do't without Compters. Let mee see,
what am I to buy for our Sheep-shearing-Feast? Three
pound of sugar, five pound of Currence, Rice: What
will this sister of mine do with rice? (WT IV.3.40-45)
I am curious about the term "Currence". I looked it up in the Schmidt
Lexicon and was unable to find a reference. Is it a reference to
currency? If so, this could help in supplying a form of comparison in
the form of the price of sugar of then and now.
Alex Houck
Santa Clara University
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Wednesday, 09 Feb 2000 19:08:09 -0500
Subject: 11.0276 Re: Money and Prostitution
Comment: Re: SHK 11.0276 Re: Money and Prostitution
Clifford Stener wrote
>Just where, I'd like to know, is any
>conspiracy so much as implied in my purely statistical account of the
>recent history of prostitution prices in New York?
Sorry Cliff. I thought a conspiracy theory was fairly implied in your
last post.
>I suppose it comes naturally to a fan of Giulianni to toss accusations
>of hysterical paranoia around to avoid the acknowledgement of the
>fundamentally conspiratorial nature of capitalist interests
Thank you for now making it explicit.
>Such measures were always aimed at ridding certain neighborhoods of
>their unaesthetic features like prostitutes, drug addicts, and the
>homeless, and were always timed to coincide with that neighborhood's
>becoming desirable real estate. <snip>. There were people selling heroin
>on the street of
>Alphabet City since the days of William Borroughs until the trendy set
>started eying the shooting galleries for their loft space. Now you can
>stroll around with your family
Who doesn't have nostalgia for the good old days; but what has any of
this got to do with Shakespeare?