Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2000 :: February ::
Re: Rghts to Images
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.0294  Saturday, 12 February 2000.

[1]     From:   Nora Kreimer <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 10 Feb 2000 12:01:38 -0300
        Subj:   RE: SHK 11.0288 Rights to ImagesRe:

[2]     From:   Larry Weiss <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Thursday, 10 Feb 2000 12:31:28 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 11.0288 Rights to Images


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Nora Kreimer <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 10 Feb 2000 12:01:38 -0300
Subject: 11.0288 Rights to Images
Comment:        RE: SHK 11.0288 Rights to Images

The MLA has info concerning the use of material downloaded from the WEB,
which includes graphics. My students acknowledge sources as prescribed
and thus, we disclaim all possible accusations of trangression.
Webmaterial us public, so long as acknowledgement is provided. There are
cases, though, as the Alhambra in Spain where no access to large images
is provided. I presume that in such cases special permission should be
granted.

Regards,
Nyke

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Larry Weiss <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Thursday, 10 Feb 2000 12:31:28 -0500
Subject: 11.0288 Rights to Images
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.0288 Rights to Images

Brother Anthony wrote

> I assume that reproductions of paintings and objects in American museums
> are subject to similar restrictions? It's not copyright as applied to
> published texts, it's rights to images of property. So long as something
> belongs to someone (person or institution) its image is protected.

Not so. A similar issue is being discussed on the copyright law list

 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 , if anyone is interested.
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.