2000

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.2342  Friday, 15 December 2000

From:           Herman Gollob <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 14 Dec 2000 15:24:06 -0500
Subject: 11.2330 Re: Roth on Verse
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.2330 Re: Roth on Verse

>Re: Herman Gollob's remarks on Philip Roth.
>
>Why seek so far a field for Roth's inspiration?  Roth is arguably our
>most "literary" writer; the broadly allusive nature of his work has been
>evident since his earliest published work.  Though your own work sounds
>very exciting, you would do well to consult James Bloom's 1997 book, THE
>LITERARY BENT (UPenn Press), which provides the most thorough and astute
>account of Roth's "Shakespearizing' to date.  For now, take this tidbit
>from Bloom's account of Shakespeare's circulation in PORTNOY'S
>COMPLAINT:  "After asking, Can you beat that for a serpent's tooth?",
>Alexander Portnoy, Roth's most notorious surrogate, summed his life as
>'some farce version of King Lear, with me in the role of Cordelia.'"

Mr.Cartelli,

Many thanks. I agree-- Roth is one of our few Men of Letters (along with
Styron and Bellow-- by the way, did you read Roth's New Yorker piece on
Bellow?)

And thanks also for tipping me to Bloom's book. I'll order it post
haste.

Herman Gollob

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.