2000

Frog Hamlet

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.2024  Saturday, 4 November 2000.

From:           Tanya Gough <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 2 Nov 2000 14:03:28 -0500
Subject:        Frog Hamlet

A bit of internet weirdness to brighten your day.

The attached link will take you to a download of an animated short
featuring an overacting frog doing "To be or not to be".

http://www.siggraph.org/artdesign/gallery/S99/animation/the_audition.html

It is very silly indeed.

Tanya Gough

Relevant Shakespeare

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.2023  Saturday, 4 November 2000.

From:           Pervez Rizvi <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 2 Nov 2000 21:47:11 -0000
Subject: 11.2009 Howard/Catholic Universities' Romeo and Juliet
Comment:        RE: SHK 11.2009 Howard/Catholic Universities' Romeo and Juliet

A week or two ago I was musing on the way Romeo and Juliet is performed
these days. I successfully counted to ten that time but Hardy's post
today prompts me to express a number of mixed feelings.

It now seems almost de rigueur in Britain for R&J to be cast with a
white Juliet and a black Romeo, or, less frequently, the reverse. This
has the effect, whether intended or not, of showing a tragedy that has
its roots in racial hatred. While the words spoken are about two
families with an ancient grudge, what the people in the audience see is
more likely to elicit thoughts of the modern world outside, with its
complicated racial problems.  (In saying this I am thinking of western
audiences.) In one way, this is good because, as they say, it makes the
play more 'relevant' and prompts the audience to reflect on the effects
of racial hatred today. But it is also limiting. To the extent that the
theoretical (as opposed to the practical) battle against racism has been
won and most decent people today consider racism to be wrong, the
deliberate different-race casting of R&J gives the audience an easy
option and avoids challenging them. Everyone can just sympathise with
the two young lovers because the desires to see love flourish and racism
rejected are shown as, happily, compatible.

More generally, the problem plays such as Measure for Measure are
perhaps not problematic enough for western audiences. The obsession with
female virginity in these plays may seem quaint or funny in western
societies where, as Philip Larkin wrote, sexual intercourse has been
going on since 1963. But in eastern societies, a woman's losing her
virginity before she marries is a matter for deep shame and dishonour,
so they are less liable to take a simplistic view of the situations
Shakespeare dramatises. In eastern societies, a marriage is still a
union of two families rather than two people; in the west, the concept
of family honour faded away long ago. (I make no judgement here whether
these are good things.) So the questions (a) "Do R&J have a duty to
accept their parents' wishes in their choice of marriage partner?" and
(b) "Is Isabella right to refuse to sacrifice her virginity to save her
brother?" are likely to trigger a more complex, and potentially more
enlightening, debate in the minds of an average eastern audience than an
average western one, which might give a straightforward 'No' to both
questions.

There is a lot to be said for making Shakespeare's plays 'relevant'
(though I personally don't subscribe to that argument, on the ground
that everything is relevant to me). But there is no shortage of relevant
contemporary literature. One of the uses of literature, and especially
old literature, is that it gives us an insight into lives and cultures
different to our own and the act of trying to sympathise with characters
in literature helps us to gain a perspective on views that we otherwise
might never question. So perhaps western audiences are not working hard
enough to understand the complexity of Shakespeare's characters'
dilemmas and perhaps they are being unwittingly cushioned in this by
well-meaning theatre professionals.

Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.2021  Saturday, 4 November 2000.

[1]     From:   Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Thursday, 02 Nov 2000 06:10:06 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 11.2013 Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis

[2]     From:   Kevin De Ornellas <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Thursday, 02 Nov 2000 17:25:16 GMT
        Subj:   Re: SHK 11.2013 Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Larry Weiss <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 02 Nov 2000 06:10:06 -0500
Subject: 11.2013 Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.2013 Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis

> Elizabeth Windsor ... owns neither coins nor stamps.

I don't know about coins, but I think she has a rather extensive stamp
collection, begun by her father.

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Kevin De Ornellas <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 02 Nov 2000 17:25:16 GMT
Subject: 11.2013 Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.2013 Re: Sonnet Suggestion for Analysis

>The face on my country's coin is that of Elizabeth Windsor - someone with
>next to no ability to hurt anyone.

But the relentless, iconic representation of QE II on these coins and
everywhere else can provide a focus point for those who purport loyalty
to her for their own interests.  Some of these people may have plenty of
ability and will to hurt people.

Kevin De Ornellas
Queen's (!) University, Belfast

Midsummer Video

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.2022  Saturday, 4 November 2000.

From:           Edna Z. Boris <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 2 Nov 2000 16:39:55 -0500
Subject:        Midsummer Video

A colleague has asked which video of Midsummer Night's Dream the college
should buy of the following three possibilities: 1982 Joseph Papp, 1992
Jonathan Miller, 1988 Peter Hall.  Any opinions?

Re: Lear Editions

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.2020  Saturday, 4 November 2000.

From:           Hugh Grady <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Thursday, 2 Nov 2000 17:47:47 -0500
Subject: 11.1991 Lear Editions
Comment:        RE: SHK 11.1991 Lear Editions

There's the 1993 Longman edn., ed. Rene Weiss, "King Lear: A Parallel
Edition." However, at least one review I read complained that the
editing of the two texts furnished had somewhat vitiated the usefulness
of the parallel attempt. I found it satisfactory, however.

--Hugh Grady

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.