Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2000 :: September ::
Re: Women's Roles
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.1683  Monday, 4 September 2000.

From:           W. L. Godshalk <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Friday, 01 Sep 2000 15:06:05 -0400
Subject: 11.1670 Re: Women's Roles
Comment:        Re: SHK 11.1670 Re: Women's Roles

Dave Kathman writes:

>There are a couple of bits of
>evidence which seem to point to sharers playing very minor female roles
>(with zero and five lines respectively), and while both of those bits of
>evidence are somewhat questionable, I'm perfectly willing to admit that
>adults, even sharers, may have sometimes played such supernumerary
>female roles.  But all the evidence we have shows that the *principal*
>female roles were played by teenage male apprentices.

A minor point:  I assume that the Weird Sisters in Macbeth were played
by older actors on the early seventeenth century stage because Banquo
notes that they have beards.  The Weird Sisters do speak more than five
lines throughout the play, but perhaps Dave would call them
"supernumerary."  And they are a special kind of female impersonator.
(And, yes, I know that some scholars ascribe the Weird Sisters to the
pen of Middleton.  In any case, they are bearded women.)

Yours, Bill Godshalk
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.