Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2000 :: August ::
Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.1470  Wednesday, 9 August 2000.

From:           Syd Kasten <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Tuesday, 8 Aug 2000 20:21:36 +0300 (IDT)
Subject: Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
Comment:        SHK 11.1447 Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress

One advantage of seeing a play on videotape as opposed to seeing it in
the theatre is the ability to run the tape back when something fleeting
catches one's attention.

Thus I am convinced by a single viewing that Mrs. Gilbert, in one of the
closing scenes of the film "Topsy Turvy" about the making of Mikado,
confides to her husband W.S. that she would have loved to be an
"actor".  I wonder if in Victorian England the term "actress" had a
negative connotation (Don't put your daughter on the stage...) whereas
"actor" would be appropriate to serious actors of either sex. The
Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia uses "actor" for both Nell Gwyn and Sarah
Bernhardt (whose reputation as an actor was well established when
"Mikado" was in the making).  I guess Encarta, published in our time,
would reflect modern usage.  Nevertheless, the line in the movie came
out so naturally and so movingly, that I would prefer not to see it as
anachronistic.

There is a question buried somewhere in the above paragraph.

Best wishes,
Syd Kasten
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.