Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2000 :: August ::
Re: Marx and Shakespeare
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.1520  Wednesday, 16 August 2000.

From:           Ed Taft <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Date:           Tuesday, 15 Aug 2000 14:07:00 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:        Marx and Shakespeare

Hugh Grady's learned distinctions are helpful in sorting out the
different meanings of "ideology," and I appreciate the clarity with
which he does so. Whether or no "art can be extra-ideological," the
question Hugh raises, is addressed by Sophie Masson's experience as an
artist. It certainly SEEMS that artists experience the act of creation
as beyond ideology.

On the other hand, going back to T. S. Eliot, while he writes that art
is impersonal and non-partisan, recent critics have found his poetry to
be highly personal and informed by a deeply conservative Christianity
that surely could be called a kind of ideology, in BOTH senses of the
term, as explained by Hugh.

So I admit my puzzlement, which will be no surprise to John Drakakis,
who expresses "bafflement" at my comments. That's OK. For two weeks,
I've been baffled by his.


©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.