|
Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress |
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 11.1240 Monday, 19 June 2000.
[1] From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 16 Jun 2000 23:49:07 -0400
Subj: Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
[2] From: Clifford Stetner <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 18 Jun 2000 00:27:51 -0400
Subj: Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 16 Jun 2000 23:49:07 -0400
Subject: Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
> Neither 'chairman' nor 'chairperson' ever makes it into my [Dales Lyles']
> memos. The
> person in charge of screwing up the meeting is simply the 'chair.' Much
> cleaner.
So true. Human beings, of either sex, or far messier than inanimate
objects.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Clifford Stetner <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 18 Jun 2000 00:27:51 -0400
Subject: 11.1223 Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
Comment: RE: SHK 11.1223 Re: To be an actor or not to be an actress
Mon dieu! waz eet hees cologne?
Clifford Stetner
CUNY Graduate Center
http://phoenix.liu.edu/~cstetner/cds.htm
> And how appalling it is that you can have a courtyard full of women (in
> French) and they're "elles." ONE guy walks in and the whole gang of 'em
> become "ils."
|