The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.0522  Tuesday, 6 March 2001

[1]     From:   David Lindley <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 5 Mar 2001 15:59:41 -0000
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.0504 Tempest Reference

[2]     From:   Clifford Stetner <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 5 Mar 2001 18:44:05 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.0504 Tempest Reference


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           David Lindley <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 5 Mar 2001 15:59:41 -0000
Subject: 12.0504 Tempest Reference
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.0504 Tempest Reference

>Graff and Kastan's "Case Studies in Critical Controversy" edition of The
>Tempest (Bedford-St. Martin's) includes three articles challenging
>the postcolonial reading

The 'edition' is by Gerald Graff and James Phelan, though it is the
critical commentary they edit; the text is actually edited by David
Bevington.

David Lindley
Professor of Renaissance Literature
University of Leeds

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Clifford Stetner <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 5 Mar 2001 18:44:05 -0500
Subject: 12.0504 Tempest Reference
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.0504 Tempest Reference

Frank Kermode recently gave a talk at the CUNY Grad Center (promoting a
new book, I believe) in which he more or less ridiculed post-colonialist
readings of The Tempest.  I thought he was being highly selective in his
choice of targets, but stuff he's written recently probably addresses
the issue somewhere.

Clifford Stetner
CUNY
http://phoenix.liu.edu/~cstetner/cds.html