The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.0566 Monday, 12 March 2001
[1] From: Brian Haylett <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2001 15:27:27 +0000
Subj: Re: SHK 12.0551 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
[2] From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2001 21:31:32 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 12.0560 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
[3] From: Stephanie Hughes <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Sunday, 11 Mar 2001 09:01:17 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 12.0471 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
[4] From: Karen Peterson-Kranz <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 04:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Subj: Re: SHK 12.0560 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Brian Haylett <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2001 15:27:27 +0000
Subject: 12.0551 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
Comment: Re: SHK 12.0551 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
>We don't need Shakespeare in schools. He is in and around us
>everywhere. He changed western thinking.
But if he had not been in my school, I would not have read English and
might well have become a Math teacher. That might have been a successful
career, but, on the whole, I prefer things the way they were. In any
case, it isn't going to happen now, and it seems that only the media
thought it was: we are told that the proposal was to keep Shakespeare in
course assessment and drop him from the final written papers. But who
knows whom to believe these days?
Brian Haylett
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 09 Mar 2001 21:31:32 -0800
Subject: 12.0560 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
Comment: Re: SHK 12.0560 Re: Bard Bade Goodbye
Marti Markus writes that
>In my country (Switzerland) the Koran has never been a compulsory
>lecture, and the Kamasutra, unfortunately, is largely unknown, but it is
>not forbidden to read either of them.
Since there are subscribers who live in countries where the Qu'ran is
compulsory, are you going to insult it too, now?
>Personally, I would be more pleased to connotate
>Shakespeare with the Kamasutra than with the Bible.
What about the Song of Songs?
>Why not have wine lists in our literary and ethical Canon instead?
Because the point of wine is to drink it, not talk about it.
Cheers,
Se
|