The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.0834  Wednesday, 11 April 2001

[1]     From:   Jim Lusardi <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Tuesday, 10 Apr 2001 18:01:01 -0400
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.0813 Re: Filmic Lears

[2]     From:   P. D. Holland <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Wednesday, 11 Apr 2001 13:45:52 +0100
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.0813 Re: Filmic Lears


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Jim Lusardi <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Tuesday, 10 Apr 2001 18:01:01 -0400
Subject: 12.0813 Re: Filmic Lears
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.0813 Re: Filmic Lears

To Chris Stroffolino re: Godard Lear--

See David Impastato. "Godard's Lear . . . Why Is It So Bad?" Shakespeare
Bulletin 12.3 (Summer 1994): 38-41.

Yours--Jim L., Co-Editor, SB

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           P. D. Holland <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Wednesday, 11 Apr 2001 13:45:52 +0100
Subject: 12.0813 Re: Filmic Lears
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.0813 Re: Filmic Lears

There is an outstanding analysis of Godard's film King Lear by Peter
Donaldson in his book 'Shakespearean Films/ Shakespearean Directors'
(1990). Many loathe the film with a remarkable intensity. I find it
brilliant, astonishing and endlessly rewarding in its engagement with
the place of Lear in our culture.

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>