The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1147 Wednesday, 16 May 2001
Date: Tuesday, 15 May 2001 15:14:40 -0700
Subject: 12.1133 Re: Seminars
Comment: Re: SHK 12.1133 Re: Seminars
Because I'm grieved to see two Shakespeareans I respect having a row, I
wrote a friend and fellow list member about my impressions. Here is her
response, and I share this with her permission. I hope peace will
follow. My comments are first.
All the best,
>>Unfortunately, Drakakis' response was deadly. I've never seen him turn so
>>The thing is, I don't think they are that
>>far apart, but it turned personal, so they don't know it. Have I misread
>>one or both of them?
>No, you haven't misread them. They are close together. The problem is that
>Sean uses the term "ethics" more broadly than Drakakis does. Drakakis is
>describing almost the same thing, but he doesn't call it ethics
>because he is drawing an arbitrary line between what
>is "personal" and what is "business". He categorizes "ethics" as belonging
>to the "personal" domain, and therefore inapplicable to academics. But
>they're describing roughly the same code
>of desired behavior.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>