The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2895 Thursday, 27 December 2001
[1] From: Thomas Larque <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 22 Dec 2001 17:54:24 -0000
Subj: Re: SHK 12.2882 Re: Grade Inflation
[2] From: Edmund Taft <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 22 Dec 2001 14:44:17 -0500
Subj: Grade Inflation
[3] From: Jim Slager <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 22 Dec 2001 16:30:37 -0800
Subj: Re: Grade Inflation
[4] From: Paul E. Doniger <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 22 Dec 2001 20:24:26 -0500
Subj: SHK 12.2882 Re: Grade Inflation
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Thomas Larque <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 22 Dec 2001 17:54:24 -0000
Subject: 12.2882 Re: Grade Inflation
Comment: Re: SHK 12.2882 Re: Grade Inflation
> In keeping
> with the philosophy of multiculturalism it is thought wrong to
> "privilege" courses on Western civilization by requiring them, despite
> the fact that it is our civilization, and that, because it is the only
> self-critical civilization, it is better than the others.
Would a "self-critical" culture really consider itself so much "better
than the others"? Isn't this missing the point of self-criticism?
Thomas Larque.
"Shakespeare and His Critics"
http://shakespearean.org.uk
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Edmund Taft <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Saturday, 22 Dec 2001 14:44:17 -0500
Subject: Grade Inflation
David Kathman introduces some interesting quotes from the 20 December
Wall Street Journal, and ends with the following observation:
|