2001

Wrapped

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2735  Tuesday, 4 December 2001

From:           Graham Hall
Date:           Monday, 03 Dec 2001 19:11:08 +0000
Subject: 12.2713 Wrapped
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.2713 Wrapped

Dana says,

[...] gangsters carry concealed (except for tommy guns, of course)[...]

Ah, but...is that a violin case I see before me?

Best wishes,
Graham Hall

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

Re: Succession

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2734  Tuesday, 4 December 2001

[1]     From:   Karen Peterson <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 3 Dec 2001 08:34:15 -0800 (PST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.2711 Re: Succession

[2]     From:   Don Bloom <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 3 Dec 2001 11:04:21 -0600
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.2711 Re: Succession

[3]     From:   Martin Steward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 3 Dec 2001 18:34:55 -0000
        Subj:   Princes in the Tower


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Karen Peterson <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 3 Dec 2001 08:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Subject: 12.2711 Re: Succession
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.2711 Re: Succession

> I know the thread is about Hamlet but I can't let
> this go by.  Too many
> inaccurate history books and Shakespeare,
> notwithstanding, Richard III
> did not kill his nephews.  This has been proven
> satisfactorily, "beyond
> reasonable doubt", many times.

Can you help us by providing citations/sources for this?

> Nor did he kill Clarence.  King Edward IV had
> Clarence murdered and
> almost certainly the princes were killed at the
> instigation of the Duke of Buckingham

Has this been 'proven satisfactorily, "beyond reasonable doubt"'?

Cheers,
Karen

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Don Bloom <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 3 Dec 2001 11:04:21 -0600
Subject: 12.2711 Re: Succession
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.2711 Re: Succession

Without being excessively repetitious of many sound (and some unsound)
responses, I hope I can clarify what's up in *Hamlet*.

The kingship is clearly to be thought of as elective, just how remains
obscure (as well it might). Hamlet says that it


Re: Subtext

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2732  Tuesday, 4 December 2001

[1]     From:   Martin Steward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 3 Dec 2001 18:01:40 -0000
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.2715 Re: Subtext

[2]     From:   Gabriel Egan <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 3 Dec 2001 21:33:36 -0000
        Subj:   Subtext

[3]     From:   Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 03 Dec 2001 16:54:56 -0800
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.2717 Re: Subtext


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Martin Steward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 3 Dec 2001 18:01:40 -0000
Subject: 12.2715 Re: Subtext
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.2715 Re: Subtext

Sam Small gets into a bit of a tizz in response to Gabriel Egan, and
forgets his own point:




Re: Eighth Wonder of the Literary World?

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2733  Tuesday, 4 December 2001

[1]     From:   Martin Steward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Monday, 3 Dec 2001 17:51:45 -0000
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.2726 Eighth Wonder of the Literary World?

[2]     From:   Robert Peters <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Tuesday, 04 Dec 2001 13:55:26 +0100
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.2726 Eighth Wonder of the Literary World?


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Martin Steward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 3 Dec 2001 17:51:45 -0000
Subject: 12.2726 Eighth Wonder of the Literary World?
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.2726 Eighth Wonder of the Literary World?

I voted (illegally!) three times under my own name and two silly
aliases, because I couldn


Scotland, PA Study Guides

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2731  Tuesday, 4 December 2001

From:           David Linton <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 3 Dec 2001 12:32:43 -0500
Subject:        Scotland, PA Study Guides

Scotland, PA, a parody of Macbeth, in a new genre we might call
Shakespeare noir, will be released in February.  I did some work on the
study guide and have copies for anyone interested.  It has a neat poster
(suitable for classroom display!) on one side and some study suggestions
and background info on the other.  If you


Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.