The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2245 Friday, 28 September 2001
Date: Thursday, 27 Sep 2001 10:23:51 -0700
Subject: 12.2236 Hamlets: fat and lean
Comment: Re: SHK 12.2236 Hamlets: fat and lean
There's also the possibility that "fat" is a misprint; Q2 (the only
version in which the line appears) is pretty sloppy. Two possibilities
cited in Furness:
W. Aldis Wright (N&Q, 9 March 1867, p. 202) states that, in 1864, he
received a letter from Dr Ingleby, communicating a 'fine reading'
proposed by 'Mr H. Wyeth, of Winchester,' of faint for 'fat.'
Plehwe (Hamlet, Prinz von Danemark, Hamburge, 1862, p. 214) refers to
IV, vii, 158, and conjectures that the same word is here used: hot.
I don't know enough paleography to judge the credibility of these
suggestions. But as Stoll says in "Not Fat or Thirty" (SQ 2:4, October,
1951, 295-301), responding to various editors' tortuous attempts to
explain this line, "Improbable emendation...may be franker and less
misleading than an improbable gloss." That's another thread, though.
Stoll likes "hot," but only on grounds of sense; he offers no other
Collier apparently glanced at this issue by interpolating lines into the
Elegy on Burbage, lines including:
'No more young Hamlet, though but scant of breath, shall cry "Revenge!"
for his dear father's death.'
Only Collier claims to have seen the source manuscript for this long
version of the Elegy.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.