The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.1728  Tuesday, 10 July 2001

[1]     From:   Stuart Taylor <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 9 Jul 2001 11:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1720 Re: "What's in a name?"

[2]     From:   Abigail Quart <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 9 Jul 2001 11:40:12 -0400
        Subj:   RE: SHK 12.1710 Re: "What's in a name?"

[3]     From:   Mike Jensen <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 09 Jul 2001 09:21:00 -0700
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1720 Re: "What's in a name?"

[4]     From:   Karen Peterson-Kranz <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 9 Jul 2001 10:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1720 Re: "What's in a name?"

[5]     From:   Mari Bonomi <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
        Date:   Monday, 9 Jul 2001 17:34:16 -0400
        Subj:   Re: SHK 12.1720 Re: "What's in a name?"


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Stuart Taylor <
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 >
Date:           Monday, 9 Jul 2001 11:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: 12.1720 Re: "What's in a name?"
Comment:        Re: SHK 12.1720 Re: "What's in a name?"

Kozuka said: 'deconstruction questions ("deconstructs") the fixed bond
between a name ("signifier") and a substance ("signified").'

Hamilton added, '"the arbitrariness of the signifier/signified relation"
is straight from Saussure.